Edun, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 735 (13 May 2025)

Edun, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 735 (13 May 2025)

The sentence imposed was unduly lenient because the rape encouraged was of a two-week-old baby, warranting Category 1A harm, and the offender's conduct was so close to secondary participation that only minimal reduction for inchoate liability was justified. The seriousness of the other counts, especially perverting the course of justice, required an upward adjustment. The appropriate sentence was an extended sentence of 16 years and two months' custody and eight years' extended licence.

Citation
[2025] EWCA Crim 735
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Offender: Keith Edun
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 May 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
Outcome
Sentence on count 2 quashed and substituted with increased extended sentence; appeal allowed.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Inchoate Offences, Serious Crime Act 2007, Protection of Children Act 1978, Perverting the Course of Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Keith Edun

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for intentionally encouraging or assisting the rape of a child was unduly lenient
  2. 2 Proper categorisation of harm and culpability under sentencing guidelines for inchoate sexual offences involving children
  3. 3 Appropriate adjustment for the seriousness of additional counts including perverting the course of justice

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was unduly lenient because the rape encouraged was of a two-week-old baby, warranting Category 1A harm, and the offender's conduct was so close to secondary participation that only minimal reduction for inchoate liability was justified. The seriousness of the other counts, especially perverting the course of justice, required an upward adjustment. The appropriate sentence was an extended sentence of 16 years and two months' custody and eight years' extended licence.

Court Disposition

Sentence on count 2 quashed and substituted with increased extended sentence; appeal allowed.

Orders

  • Quash sentence on count 2.
  • Substitute extended sentence of 16 years and two months' custody and eight years' extended licence (total 24 years and two months).