Edun, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 735 (13 May 2025)
The sentence imposed was unduly lenient because the rape encouraged was of a two-week-old baby, warranting Category 1A harm, and the offender's conduct was so close to secondary participation that only minimal reduction for inchoate liability was justified. The seriousness of the other counts, especially perverting the course of justice, required an upward adjustment. The appropriate sentence was an extended sentence of 16 years and two months' custody and eight years' extended licence.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 735
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Offender: Keith Edun
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
- Outcome
- Sentence on count 2 quashed and substituted with increased extended sentence; appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Inchoate Offences, Serious Crime Act 2007, Protection of Children Act 1978, Perverting the Course of Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Keith Edun
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for intentionally encouraging or assisting the rape of a child was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper categorisation of harm and culpability under sentencing guidelines for inchoate sexual offences involving children
- 3 Appropriate adjustment for the seriousness of additional counts including perverting the course of justice
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was unduly lenient because the rape encouraged was of a two-week-old baby, warranting Category 1A harm, and the offender's conduct was so close to secondary participation that only minimal reduction for inchoate liability was justified. The seriousness of the other counts, especially perverting the course of justice, required an upward adjustment. The appropriate sentence was an extended sentence of 16 years and two months' custody and eight years' extended licence.
Court Disposition
Sentence on count 2 quashed and substituted with increased extended sentence; appeal allowed.
Orders
- Quash sentence on count 2.
- Substitute extended sentence of 16 years and two months' custody and eight years' extended licence (total 24 years and two months).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment