VDT, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1567 (13 November 2025)
The original sentence was unduly lenient because the lead rape offence should have been categorised as 1B due to extreme harm and pregnancy, with multiple aggravating features and additional offending against two further victims requiring a higher custodial term. The correct sentence was an extended sentence of 20½ years (16½ years custody, 4 years extended licence).
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 1567
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Offender: VDT
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988) / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Unduly Lenient Sentences, Historic Sexual Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
VDT
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988) / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for multiple serious sexual offences was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper categorisation of harm and culpability under sentencing guidelines for historic sexual offences
- 3 Appropriate uplift for multiple victims and aggravating features
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was unduly lenient because the lead rape offence should have been categorised as 1B due to extreme harm and pregnancy, with multiple aggravating features and additional offending against two further victims requiring a higher custodial term. The correct sentence was an extended sentence of 20½ years (16½ years custody, 4 years extended licence).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Sentence on count 3 quashed and substituted with an extended sentence of 20½ years (16½ years custody, 4 years extended licence)
- All other orders remain except the victim surcharge order, which is quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment