Rex v Sam Whicker
The sentence of 4 years was unduly lenient because the judge failed to give sufficient upward adjustment for the enormous quantity of cocaine (90 kgs) transported by the offender, whose role straddled lesser and significant. The proper starting point should have been 9 years, reduced for mitigation and plea, resulting in a sentence of 5 years and 4 months.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Offender: Sam Whicker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence quashed and substituted
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Unduly Lenient Sentences, Role of Offender, Sentencing Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Sam Whicker
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on Sam Whicker was unduly lenient for being concerned in the supply of a controlled drug of Class A (cocaine)
- 2 Proper application of sentencing guidelines for large quantities of drugs
- 3 Assessment of offender's role and culpability in the offence
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 4 years was unduly lenient because the judge failed to give sufficient upward adjustment for the enormous quantity of cocaine (90 kgs) transported by the offender, whose role straddled lesser and significant. The proper starting point should have been 9 years, reduced for mitigation and plea, resulting in a sentence of 5 years and 4 months.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence quashed and substituted
Orders
- Leave granted to refer sentence as unduly lenient
- Original sentence of 4 years quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment