R v Damilola Ogundeyin
The evidence did not establish that the applicant had an operational or management function or that his reward was significant; his role was properly categorised as 'lesser' under category 2 of the guidelines, but the sentence should be at the top of the range due to aggravating features. The original sentence was quashed and substituted with a lower sentence consistent with a 'lesser role'.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant/appellant: Damilola Ogundeyin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Appeals Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Damilola Ogundeyin
Applicant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the applicant's role as 'significant' rather than 'lesser' under the Sentencing Council guidelines for supply of Class A drugs
- 2 Whether too much weight was placed on the applicant's historic serious previous conviction
- 3 Whether insufficient credit was given for mitigation
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not establish that the applicant had an operational or management function or that his reward was significant; his role was properly categorised as 'lesser' under category 2 of the guidelines, but the sentence should be at the top of the range due to aggravating features. The original sentence was quashed and substituted with a lower sentence consistent with a 'lesser role'.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced
Orders
- Extension of time for leave to appeal granted
- Sentence of nine years' imprisonment quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment