R v Damilola Ogundeyin

R v Damilola Ogundeyin

The evidence did not establish that the applicant had an operational or management function or that his reward was significant; his role was properly categorised as 'lesser' under category 2 of the guidelines, but the sentence should be at the top of the range due to aggravating features. The original sentence was quashed and substituted with a lower sentence consistent with a 'lesser role'.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant/appellant: Damilola Ogundeyin
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Drug Offences, Appeals Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Damilola Ogundeyin

Applicant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the applicant's role as 'significant' rather than 'lesser' under the Sentencing Council guidelines for supply of Class A drugs
  2. 2 Whether too much weight was placed on the applicant's historic serious previous conviction
  3. 3 Whether insufficient credit was given for mitigation

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence did not establish that the applicant had an operational or management function or that his reward was significant; his role was properly categorised as 'lesser' under category 2 of the guidelines, but the sentence should be at the top of the range due to aggravating features. The original sentence was quashed and substituted with a lower sentence consistent with a 'lesser role'.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced

Orders

  • Extension of time for leave to appeal granted
  • Sentence of nine years' imprisonment quashed