Collins & Ors v Wind Energy Holding Company Ltd [2025] EWHC 40 (Comm) (14 January 2025)

Collins & Ors v Wind Energy Holding Company Ltd [2025] EWHC 40 (Comm) (14 January 2025)

No serious procedural irregularity occurred because the arbitrator acted within her discretion in refusing further adjournments and in managing the admission of evidence. The claimants failed to act promptly to seek a variation of the freezing order and had opportunities to participate in the arbitration. The arbitrator's conduct did not cause substantial injustice under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996.

Citation
[2025] EWHC 40 (Comm)
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Emma Louise Collins; Claimant/applicant: Aman Lakhaney; Claimant/applicant: Khadija Bilal Siddique; Claimant/applicant: Colome Investments Limited; Claimant/applicant: ALKBS LLC; Claimant/respondent to Counterclaim: Thun Reansuwan; Claimant/respondent to Counterclaim: Keleston Holdings Limited; Defendant/respondent/counterclaimant: Wind Energy Holding Company Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Arbitration Claim / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 68 Arbitration Act 1996
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Serious Procedural Irregularity, Section 68 Arbitration Act 1996, Adjournment of Hearing, Admission of Evidence, Right to Legal Representation, Freezing Orders, Costs in Arbitration
Arbitration Commercial Law Serious Procedural Irregularity Section 68 Arbitration Act 1996 Adjournment of Hearing Admission of Evidence Right to Legal Representation Freezing Orders +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Emma Louise Collins

Claimant/applicant

Aman Lakhaney

Claimant/applicant

Khadija Bilal Siddique

Claimant/applicant

Colome Investments Limited

Claimant/applicant

ALKBS LLC

Claimant/applicant

Thun Reansuwan

Claimant/respondent to Counterclaim

Keleston Holdings Limited

Claimant/respondent to Counterclaim

Wind Energy Holding Company Ltd

Defendant/respondent/counterclaimant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Arbitration Claim / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 68 Arbitration Act 1996

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the arbitrator committed a serious procedural irregularity under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 by refusing to adjourn the evidential hearing to allow the claimants to obtain legal representation and/or prepare for the hearing and for Ms Collins to recover from a breakdown
  2. 2 Whether the arbitrator wrongly declined to admit certain evidence and to test the evidence tendered by the defendant
  3. 3 Whether the arbitrator took an inappropriate approach to various matters in the Final Award

Ratio Decidendi

No serious procedural irregularity occurred because the arbitrator acted within her discretion in refusing further adjournments and in managing the admission of evidence. The claimants failed to act promptly to seek a variation of the freezing order and had opportunities to participate in the arbitration. The arbitrator's conduct did not cause substantial injustice under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Application to set aside the arbitral award under section 68 Arbitration Act 1996 is dismissed.
  • No order for further adjournment.