The Occupiers of Samuel Garside House v Bellway Homes Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 772 (KB) (13 January 2025)
The court held that defective or late service does not automatically nullify the claim form or proceedings; the claim remains extant unless and until the court declines jurisdiction. A defendant must seek permission to file an acknowledgment of service out of time and, if granted, may then pursue a CPR Part 11 jurisdiction challenge. The statutory waiver under CPR 11 applies if no timely application is made after acknowledgment of service. The court refused to grant the first defendant permission to file an acknowledgment of service out of time for the purpose of a jurisdiction challenge, and refused permission to the claimant to serve particulars of claim out of time, effectively...
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 772 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: The Occupiers of Samuel Garside House; First Defendant: Bellway Homes Limited; Second Defendant: Sheppard Robson Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedural (jurisdiction/service) / Post Judgment Applications Following Partial Settlement; Determination of Applications for Retrospective Extension of Time to File Acknowledgment of Service and to Serve Particulars of Claim Out of Time
- Outcome
- Applications refused; claim against first defendant cannot proceed.
- Legal Topics
- Service of Claim Form, Jurisdiction Challenge, Relief From Sanctions, Retrospective Extension of Time, Waiver of Jurisdictional Objection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Occupiers of Samuel Garside House
Claimant
Bellway Homes Limited
First Defendant
Sheppard Robson Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedural (jurisdiction/service) / Post Judgment Applications Following Partial Settlement; Determination of Applications for Retrospective Extension of Time to File Acknowledgment of Service and to Serve Particulars of Claim Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first defendant should be permitted to file an acknowledgment of service out of time and make a CPR Part 11 jurisdiction challenge
- 2 Whether the claimant should be permitted to file and serve particulars of claim out of time
- 3 Whether additional claimants should be added if the claim survives, and on what terms
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that defective or late service does not automatically nullify the claim form or proceedings; the claim remains extant unless and until the court declines jurisdiction. A defendant must seek permission to file an acknowledgment of service out of time and, if granted, may then pursue a CPR Part 11 jurisdiction challenge. The statutory waiver under CPR 11 applies if no timely application is made after acknowledgment of service. The court refused to grant the first defendant permission to file an acknowledgment of service out of time for the purpose of a jurisdiction challenge, and refused permission to the claimant to serve particulars of claim out of time, effectively...
Court Disposition
Applications refused; claim against first defendant cannot proceed.
Orders
- Refusal of first defendant's application for retrospective extension of time to file acknowledgment of service and make CPR Part 11 jurisdiction challenge.
- Refusal of claimant's application for permission to serve particulars of claim out of time.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment