Valentine London Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor [2026] EWHC 790 (Admin) (01 April 2026)
The claimant failed to serve the sealed claim form within the statutory 6-week period as required by s.288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and CPR PD54D §4.11. Service of an unsealed claim form by email before the deadline did not constitute valid service. The claimant was aware of the correct method and address for service but failed to take the necessary steps. There was no good reason to retrospectively validate service under CPR 6.15 or to extend time under CPR 7.6(3). The claim was not properly served and must be set aside.
- Citation
- [2026] EWHC 790 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Valentine London Limited; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: South Hams District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Planning Statutory Review (s.288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Application to Discharge Order Setting Aside Claim for Failure to Serve Sealed Claim Form Within 6 Week Statutory Period
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; application to discharge order refused.
- Legal Topics
- Service of Claim Form, Retrospective Validation of Service (cpr 6.15), Extension of Time for Service (cpr 7.6(3)), Planning Statutory Review, Jurisdictional Requirements, Access to Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Valentine London Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
South Hams District Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Planning Statutory Review (s.288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Application to Discharge Order Setting Aside Claim for Failure to Serve Sealed Claim Form Within 6 Week Statutory Period
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should retrospectively validate steps taken as good service under CPR 6.15
- 2 Whether the court should extend time for service under CPR 7.6(3) by analogy via CPR 3.1(2)(a)
- 3 Whether the claimant took all reasonable steps to effect service within the statutory period
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to serve the sealed claim form within the statutory 6-week period as required by s.288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and CPR PD54D §4.11. Service of an unsealed claim form by email before the deadline did not constitute valid service. The claimant was aware of the correct method and address for service but failed to take the necessary steps. There was no good reason to retrospectively validate service under CPR 6.15 or to extend time under CPR 7.6(3). The claim was not properly served and must be set aside.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; application to discharge order refused.
Orders
- Claim for planning statutory review set aside for failure to serve sealed claim form within statutory period.
- Application for retrospective validation of service and extension of time refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment