Farah v Abdullahi & Ors [2018] EWHC 738 (QB) (20 April 2018)

Farah v Abdullahi & Ors [2018] EWHC 738 (QB) (20 April 2018)

The claimant is entitled to proceed against the unnamed third defendant because the claim is capable of conferring a real benefit, either by challenging the policy avoidance or via the MIB Uninsured Drivers Agreement, and the right to proceed should not depend on the section 151 liability being incontrovertibly established. No permission is required to issue against an unnamed defendant, and service on the insurer is valid. Innocent non-disclosure in the without notice application does not justify setting aside the order.

Citation
[2018] EWHC 738 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Idris Farah (by his Litigation Friend Fatuma Mohamad); First Defendant: Ahmed Abdullahi; Second Defendant: Probus Insurance Company Europe DAC; Third Defendant: The person unknown driving vehicle registration number V168DLU who collided with the claimant on 6 September 2014; Fourth Defendant: EUI Limited; Fifth Defendant: Motor Insurers' Bureau
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 April 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil (personal Injury, Road Traffic Accident) / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Order Permitting Service on Unnamed Defendant
Outcome
Application to set aside Master Eastman's order dismissed.
Legal Topics
Service of Proceedings on Unnamed Defendants, Section 151 and 152 Road Traffic Act 1988, Compatibility With EU Motor Insurance Directives, Alternative Service Under CPR R 6.15, Non Disclosure in Without Notice Applications
Civil Procedure Insurance Law Personal Injury Service of Proceedings on Unnamed Defendants Section 151 and 152 Road Traffic Act 1988 Compatibility With EU Motor Insurance Directives Alternative Service Under CPR R 6.15 Non Disclosure in Without Notice Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Idris Farah (by his Litigation Friend Fatuma Mohamad)

Claimant

Ahmed Abdullahi

First Defendant

Probus Insurance Company Europe DAC

Second Defendant

The person unknown driving vehicle registration number V168DLU who collided with the claimant on 6 September 2014

Third Defendant

EUI Limited

Fourth Defendant

Motor Insurers' Bureau

Fifth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (personal Injury, Road Traffic Accident) / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Order Permitting Service on Unnamed Defendant

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a claim can proceed against an unnamed defendant where the insurer has avoided the policy under section 152(2) of the Road Traffic Act 1988
  2. 2 Whether the principles in Cameron v Hussain apply where section 151 liability is disputed
  3. 3 Whether permission is required to issue proceedings against an unnamed defendant

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant is entitled to proceed against the unnamed third defendant because the claim is capable of conferring a real benefit, either by challenging the policy avoidance or via the MIB Uninsured Drivers Agreement, and the right to proceed should not depend on the section 151 liability being incontrovertibly established. No permission is required to issue against an unnamed defendant, and service on the insurer is valid. Innocent non-disclosure in the without notice application does not justify setting aside the order.

Court Disposition

Application to set aside Master Eastman's order dismissed.

Orders

  • Claimant permitted to proceed against the unnamed third defendant.
  • Service on the unnamed defendant via the fourth defendant's solicitors is valid.