Bradford & Bingley Building Socieity v Harper, estate of
The Court of Appeal cannot entertain the application to set aside the consent order on the grounds advanced; such an application must be brought by separate action in the appropriate court. The application is misconceived and must be dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Bradford & Bingley Building Society; Defendant/applicant: Estate of Victor Francis Harper (Deceased)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Consent Order and for Stay of Possession
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Consent Orders, Fraud on the Court, Possession Proceedings, Mortgage Arrears, Jurisdiction of Appellate Courts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bradford & Bingley Building Society
Claimant/respondent
Estate of Victor Francis Harper (Deceased)
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Consent Order and for Stay of Possession
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal can set aside a consent order on grounds of fraud
- 2 Whether the application should be brought by separate action
- 3 Whether a stay of possession should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal cannot entertain the application to set aside the consent order on the grounds advanced; such an application must be brought by separate action in the appropriate court. The application is misconceived and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Stay of possession granted until 10.00 am on Tuesday 28 January 2003
- Civil Appeal Office to inform respondent's solicitors of the refusal of permission and the terms of the stay
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment