Dalton v Gough Cooper & Company Ltd [2014] EWHC 1556 (QB) (16 May 2014)

Dalton v Gough Cooper & Company Ltd [2014] EWHC 1556 (QB) (16 May 2014)

The appeal was allowed because the lower court failed to consider material evidence and submissions showing that Gough Cooper had a real prospect of successfully defending the claim, as the claimant's own evidence did not support the pleaded case. The lack of promptness in applying to set aside was not fatal given the real prospect of success, and the lower court's focus solely on the Defence document was an error.

Citation
[2014] EWHC 1556
Parties
Respondent/claimant: Pamela June Dalton (executrix of the estate of Frederick John Dalton deceased); Appellant/defendant: Gough Cooper & Company Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 May 2014
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal From Refusal to Set Aside Default Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Default Judgment, CPR 13.3, Negligence, Breach of Statutory Duty, Asbestos Exposure, Limitation of Actions
Civil Procedure Tort Setting Aside Default Judgment CPR 13.3 Negligence Breach of Statutory Duty Asbestos Exposure Limitation of Actions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pamela June Dalton (executrix of the estate of Frederick John Dalton deceased)

Respondent/claimant

Gough Cooper & Company Limited

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal (civil) / Appeal From Refusal to Set Aside Default Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant (Gough Cooper) had a real prospect of successfully defending the claim under CPR 13.3(1)(a)
  2. 2 Whether there was some other good reason to set aside the default judgment under CPR 13.3(1)(b)
  3. 3 Whether the application to set aside was made promptly under CPR 13.3(2)

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was allowed because the lower court failed to consider material evidence and submissions showing that Gough Cooper had a real prospect of successfully defending the claim, as the claimant's own evidence did not support the pleaded case. The lack of promptness in applying to set aside was not fatal given the real prospect of success, and the lower court's focus solely on the Defence document was an error.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Default judgment obtained on 3 December 2013 set aside
  • Costs to be determined after further submissions if not agreed