Thomson Directories Ltd v Planet Telecom Plc & Ors [2003] EWHC 1882 (Ch) (04 July 2003)

Thomson Directories Ltd v Planet Telecom Plc & Ors [2003] EWHC 1882 (Ch) (04 July 2003)

Mr. Hutcheon failed to act promptly in issuing and serving his application to set aside the judgment and failed to provide a good reason for non-attendance at the hearing, as required by CPR 39.3(5).

Citation
[2003] EWHC 1882 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Thomson Directories Limited; First Defendant: Planet Telecom Plc; Second Defendant: Dancibar Limited; Third Defendant: 192 Enquiries. Com Limited; Fourth Defendant: Peter Hutcheon
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Judgment (chancery Division) / Post Judgment Application
Outcome
Application to set aside judgment dismissed
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Judgment, CPR 39.3, Database Rights, Copyright Infringement, Adjournment for Medical Reasons

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomson Directories Limited

Claimant

Planet Telecom Plc

First Defendant

Dancibar Limited

Second Defendant

192 Enquiries. Com Limited

Third Defendant

Peter Hutcheon

Fourth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside Judgment (chancery Division) / Post Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether the fourth defendant's application to set aside the judgment under CPR 39.3 should be granted
  2. 2 Whether the applicant acted promptly
  3. 3 Whether there was a good reason for non-attendance at trial

Ratio Decidendi

Mr. Hutcheon failed to act promptly in issuing and serving his application to set aside the judgment and failed to provide a good reason for non-attendance at the hearing, as required by CPR 39.3(5).

Court Disposition

Application to set aside judgment dismissed

Orders

  • Application to set aside the judgment of 6 March 2003 is dismissed