Coghlan v Bailey & Anor

Coghlan v Bailey & Anor

The appeal was dismissed because the alleged misrepresentations, even if established, were not material to the outcome of the original judgment, and there was no real prospect of success in establishing that the judgment was obtained by fraud or that any relief could be granted. There was also no compelling reason for a trial.

Parties
Claimant: Arran Coghlan; First Defendant: Daniel Bailey; Second Defendant: The National Crime Agency
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Summary Judgment/strike Out Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Judgment for Fraud, Summary Judgment, Civil Recovery Under POCA, Materiality of Misrepresentation
Civil Procedure Fraud Proceeds of Crime Setting Aside Judgment for Fraud Summary Judgment Civil Recovery Under POCA Materiality of Misrepresentation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Arran Coghlan

Claimant

Daniel Bailey

First Defendant

The National Crime Agency

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Summary Judgment/strike Out Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judgment/order of Simon J was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation
  2. 2 Whether there was a real prospect of success in establishing fraudulent misrepresentation
  3. 3 Whether there was any other compelling reason for a trial

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the alleged misrepresentations, even if established, were not material to the outcome of the original judgment, and there was no real prospect of success in establishing that the judgment was obtained by fraud or that any relief could be granted. There was also no compelling reason for a trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • No need to consider Respondent’s Notice