Hackney v Driscoll [2003] EWCA Civ 1037 (16 July 2003)
Where a defendant had notice of the proceedings and participated, but did not receive notice of the hearing date, the court is not obliged to set aside the judgment as of right; it must apply CPR 39.3(5), including the requirement that the applicant has a reasonable prospect of success at trial.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 1037
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: London Borough of Hackney; Defendant/appellant: Robert Driscoll
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From Circuit Judge's Refusal to Set Aside Possession Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Judgments, Possession Proceedings, Notice of Hearing, CPR 39.3(5), Right to Fair Hearing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
London Borough of Hackney
Claimant/respondent
Robert Driscoll
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From Circuit Judge's Refusal to Set Aside Possession Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a defendant who had notice of proceedings but not of the trial date is entitled as of right to have a possession order set aside
- 2 Whether the court must consider the applicant's prospects of success under CPR 39.3(5)(c) in such circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Where a defendant had notice of the proceedings and participated, but did not receive notice of the hearing date, the court is not obliged to set aside the judgment as of right; it must apply CPR 39.3(5), including the requirement that the applicant has a reasonable prospect of success at trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; order of circuit judge refusing to set aside possession order affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment