Coles v Perfect & Ors
The court has inherent jurisdiction to approve the settlement where neither party alleges incapacity and the evidence is equivocal. Approval under these circumstances is valid and binding, and a trial of capacity is unnecessary and disproportionate.
- Parties
- Claimant: Rebecca Coles; First Defendant: David Perfect; Second Defendant: Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Application for Court Approval of Settlement
- Outcome
- Settlement approved
- Legal Topics
- Settlement Approval, Capacity of Claimant, Limitation of Liability, Marine Accident
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rebecca Coles
Claimant
David Perfect
First Defendant
Others
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Application for Court Approval of Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to approve a settlement where the claimant's capacity is in doubt but not determined
- 2 Whether the settlement is valid and binding under CPR 21 rule 10 in the absence of a declaration of incapacity
Ratio Decidendi
The court has inherent jurisdiction to approve the settlement where neither party alleges incapacity and the evidence is equivocal. Approval under these circumstances is valid and binding, and a trial of capacity is unnecessary and disproportionate.
Court Disposition
Settlement approved
Orders
- The court approves the settlement. Precise wording of the order to be discussed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment