UVC Ltd (t/a Power Train Projects) v Doug Kiddie Engineering Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 922 (8 May 2001)
A binding settlement agreement was reached between the claimant and defendant as a reasonable observer would not conclude that the agreement was subject to the unresolved costs of the Part 20 defendant, which were not mentioned or reserved during negotiations.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 922
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: UVC Limited (T/a Power Train Projects); Defendant/applicant: Doug Kiddie Engineering Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Settlement Agreements, Interpretation of Contracts, Costs in Civil Litigation, Part 20 Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UVC Limited (T/a Power Train Projects)
Claimant/respondent
Doug Kiddie Engineering Limited
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a binding settlement agreement was reached between the claimant and defendant without reference to the Part 20 defendant's costs
- 2 Whether the existence of unresolved Part 20 defendant costs prevented a complete agreement
- 3 Whether the test for agreement is objective and what a reasonable observer would conclude
Ratio Decidendi
A binding settlement agreement was reached between the claimant and defendant as a reasonable observer would not conclude that the agreement was subject to the unresolved costs of the Part 20 defendant, which were not mentioned or reserved during negotiations.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment