NM Financial Management Ltd v Marshall [1997] EWCA Civ 1237 (13th March, 1997)
The consideration for the payment of renewal commission was Mr Marshall's services in introducing business prior to termination, not the acceptance of the invalid restraint. Clause 10(g) should stand without the invalid provisos, and Mr Marshall is entitled to post-termination renewal commission.
- Citation
- [1997] EWCA Civ 1237
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: NM Financial Management Limited; Plaintiff/respondent: Anthony Arthur Marshall
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Severance of Invalid Contract Terms, Restraint of Trade, Post Termination Commission, Consideration in Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NM Financial Management Limited
Defendant/appellant
Anthony Arthur Marshall
Plaintiff/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Marshall is entitled to renewal commission after termination of the agency agreement despite not satisfying the invalid restraint of trade condition in Clause 10(g)
- 2 Whether Clause 10(g) should be struck out in its entirety or stand shorn of the invalid provisos
Ratio Decidendi
The consideration for the payment of renewal commission was Mr Marshall's services in introducing business prior to termination, not the acceptance of the invalid restraint. Clause 10(g) should stand without the invalid provisos, and Mr Marshall is entitled to post-termination renewal commission.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Application for leave to appeal to the House of Lords refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment