Simmons v Post Office [2001] EWCA Civ 1486 (4 October 2001)
No exceptional reason was shown to justify the extension of time for appeal; the applicant's allegations were unsubstantiated and did not affect the outcome of the original tribunal decision; procedural rules and time limits apply equally to all parties.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1486
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Kenneth William Simmons; Defendant/respondent: The Post Office
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Employment Appeals Tribunal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Ancillary Application for Disclosure
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused; ancillary application for disclosure refused.
- Legal Topics
- Sex Discrimination, Victimisation, Extension of Time, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth William Simmons
Claimant/applicant
The Post Office
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Employment Appeals Tribunal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Ancillary Application for Disclosure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there were exceptional reasons to extend time for appeal against the Employment Tribunal's decision
- 2 Whether alleged misconduct or irregularities justified extension of time
- 3 Whether procedural rules should be relaxed for litigants in person
Ratio Decidendi
No exceptional reason was shown to justify the extension of time for appeal; the applicant's allegations were unsubstantiated and did not affect the outcome of the original tribunal decision; procedural rules and time limits apply equally to all parties.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused; ancillary application for disclosure refused.
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Application for production of tape and documents refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment