BJM v Nathan Eyre & Ors [2010] EWHC 2856 (QB) (12 November 2010)

BJM v Nathan Eyre & Ors [2010] EWHC 2856 (QB) (12 November 2010)

The claimant is entitled to substantial damages for severe psychiatric injury, loss of amenity, aggravated damages, and loss of earnings, as the abuse was the primary cause of his PTSD and a material contributor to his personality disorder and employment incapacity, notwithstanding pre-existing vulnerabilities. The court adopted a broad-brush approach to causation and quantum, discounting for contingencies but awarding aggravated damages due to the egregious nature of the abuse.

Citation
[2010] EWHC 2856 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: BJM; First Defendant: Nathan Eyre; Second Defendant: Raymond Colin Hawthorne; Third Defendant: Leslie Loram; Fourth Defendant: David Riley
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim / Assessment of Damages After Default Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant against all defendants jointly and severally.
Legal Topics
Sexual Abuse, Aggravated Damages, Loss of Earnings, Causation, Psychiatric Injury, Assessment of Damages
Tort Law Personal Injury Child Abuse Sexual Abuse Aggravated Damages Loss of Earnings Causation Psychiatric Injury +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BJM

Claimant

Nathan Eyre

First Defendant

Raymond Colin Hawthorne

Second Defendant

Leslie Loram

Third Defendant

David Riley

Fourth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Claim / Assessment of Damages After Default Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Extent of damages for personal injuries and financial loss arising from sexual and physical abuse
  2. 2 Causation between abuse and psychiatric/educational/employment consequences
  3. 3 Appropriate quantum for pain, suffering, loss of amenity, aggravated damages, and loss of earnings

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant is entitled to substantial damages for severe psychiatric injury, loss of amenity, aggravated damages, and loss of earnings, as the abuse was the primary cause of his PTSD and a material contributor to his personality disorder and employment incapacity, notwithstanding pre-existing vulnerabilities. The court adopted a broad-brush approach to causation and quantum, discounting for contingencies but awarding aggravated damages due to the egregious nature of the abuse.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant against all defendants jointly and severally.

Orders

  • Defendants to pay £209,450 in damages plus £7,155.26 interest, jointly and severally.
  • Defendants to pay claimant's costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.