Harvey, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 83 (19 January 2024)
There are no arguable grounds of appeal in either case; the applicant has failed to provide any sufficient explanation for the substantial delay; the applications are wholly without merit and must be refused. A loss of time order is appropriate to discourage unmeritorious applications.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 83
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant/defendant: Martin Harvey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and for Representation Order; Extension of Time
- Outcome
- applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Malicious Communications, Criminal Damage, Appeals, Extension of Time, Loss of Time Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Martin Harvey
Applicant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and for Representation Order; Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are arguable grounds for appeal against conviction in two separate criminal cases involving sexual offences and malicious communications/criminal damage
- 2 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient explanation for the substantial delay in seeking leave to appeal
- 3 Whether a loss of time order should be imposed for unmeritorious applications
Ratio Decidendi
There are no arguable grounds of appeal in either case; the applicant has failed to provide any sufficient explanation for the substantial delay; the applications are wholly without merit and must be refused. A loss of time order is appropriate to discourage unmeritorious applications.
Court Disposition
applications refused
Orders
- All applications for leave to appeal and for representation order refused
- Extension of time refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment