RF, R. v
The original sentence was unduly lenient because it failed to reflect the seriousness of the offences, the aggravating features (age disparity, breach of trust, course of conduct, and impact on the victim), and the proper application of the Sentencing Council Guidelines. The appropriate sentence, after full credit for guilty pleas and time served, was 3 years and 10 months' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently, with the sentence for the notification offence to remain at 6 months concurrent.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Offender: RF
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (reference by Attorney General) / Sentence Review Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentences increased
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Unduly Lenient Sentences, Abuse of Position of Trust
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
RF
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (reference by Attorney General) / Sentence Review Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for sexual activity with a child family member was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper categorisation of harm and culpability under Sentencing Council Guidelines
- 3 Appropriate sentence for multiple offences involving breach of trust
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was unduly lenient because it failed to reflect the seriousness of the offences, the aggravating features (age disparity, breach of trust, course of conduct, and impact on the victim), and the proper application of the Sentencing Council Guidelines. The appropriate sentence, after full credit for guilty pleas and time served, was 3 years and 10 months' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently, with the sentence for the notification offence to remain at 6 months concurrent.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentences increased
Orders
- Sentences of 2 years suspended on counts 1 to 4 quashed and substituted with 3 years and 10 months' imprisonment concurrent on each count
- Sentence of 6 months for notification offence to remain, served concurrently
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment