A v Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (Trustees of) & Ors [2015] EWHC 1722 (QB) (19 June 2015)
The relationship between Jehovah's Witnesses' elders/ministerial servants and the organisation is sufficiently close to employment to justify vicarious liability for sexual abuse committed by Peter Stewart. The claimant did not have sufficient knowledge under s.14 Limitation Act 1980 until 2014, and it is equitable to disapply the limitation period under s.33 for both the assault and safeguarding claims. The defendants are vicariously liable for the abuse and the negligent safeguarding failure.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 1722 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: A; First Defendants: The Trustees of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society; Second Defendants: The Trustees of the Loughborough Blackbrook Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses; Third Defendants: The Trustees of the Loughborough Southwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury (sexual Abuse) – Civil Claim / High Court Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed. Judgment for the claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Abuse, Vicarious Liability of Religious Organisations, Limitation Act 1980 – S.14 Knowledge and S.33 Discretion, Safeguarding Duties, Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Claimant
The Trustees of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society
First Defendants
The Trustees of the Loughborough Blackbrook Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses
Second Defendants
The Trustees of the Loughborough Southwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses
Third Defendants
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury (sexual Abuse) – Civil Claim / High Court Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants are vicariously liable for sexual assaults committed by Peter Stewart ('the assault claim')
- 2 Whether the defendants are vicariously liable for negligent safeguarding by elders ('the safeguarding claim')
- 3 Whether the limitation period should be disapplied under s.33 Limitation Act 1980
Ratio Decidendi
The relationship between Jehovah's Witnesses' elders/ministerial servants and the organisation is sufficiently close to employment to justify vicarious liability for sexual abuse committed by Peter Stewart. The claimant did not have sufficient knowledge under s.14 Limitation Act 1980 until 2014, and it is equitable to disapply the limitation period under s.33 for both the assault and safeguarding claims. The defendants are vicariously liable for the abuse and the negligent safeguarding failure.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed. Judgment for the claimant.
Orders
- Limitation period disapplied under s.33 Limitation Act 1980 for both assault and safeguarding claims.
- Defendants held vicariously liable for sexual abuse and negligent safeguarding.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment