Sibir Energy Ltd & Ors v (1) Slocom Trading Ltd & Ors

Sibir Energy Ltd & Ors v (1) Slocom Trading Ltd & Ors

The December Loan Agreement was not a sham because the parties intended to create the legal obligations set out in the agreement. The Assignment Agreement, although made to place assets beyond the reach of creditors, was not at an undervalue and thus not voidable under Section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

Parties
Appellant / Defendant: Sibir Energy Limited; Appellant / Defendant: Maritime Villa Holding SCI; Appellant / Defendant: Tatik Inc; Respondent / Claimant: Slocom Trading Limited; Respondent / Claimant: Derbent Management Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 June 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Trial Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sham Transactions, Assignment of Debt, Fraudulent Preference, Section 423 Insolvency Act 1986, Implied Terms in Contracts
Contract Law Insolvency Law Sham Transactions Assignment of Debt Fraudulent Preference Section 423 Insolvency Act 1986 Implied Terms in Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sibir Energy Limited

Appellant / Defendant

Maritime Villa Holding SCI

Appellant / Defendant

Tatik Inc

Appellant / Defendant

Slocom Trading Limited

Respondent / Claimant

Derbent Management Limited

Respondent / Claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Trial Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the December Loan Agreement was a sham
  2. 2 Whether the Assignment Agreement was voidable as a fraud on creditors under Section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Ratio Decidendi

The December Loan Agreement was not a sham because the parties intended to create the legal obligations set out in the agreement. The Assignment Agreement, although made to place assets beyond the reach of creditors, was not at an undervalue and thus not voidable under Section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; trial judgment upheld.