Philp & Anor v Cook [2017] EWHC 3023 (QB) (28 November 2017)
Clause 8.3 of the SPA, properly construed, extinguishes the underlying liability for breach of warranty if not notified within two years, thereby precluding the Buyer from relying on alleged breaches of warranty as an equitable set-off against the Sellers' indemnity claim.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 3023
- Parties
- Appellant and Claimant: Elaine Philp; Appellant and Claimant: Robert Irving; Respondent and Defendant: Lesley Joan Cook
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal of Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Share Purchase Agreement, Indemnity, Breach of Warranty, Equitable Set Off, Contractual Limitation Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elaine Philp
Appellant and Claimant
Robert Irving
Appellant and Claimant
Lesley Joan Cook
Respondent and Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal of Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether contractual notification provisions in a share purchase agreement preclude the buyer from relying on alleged breaches of warranty as an equitable set-off against the sellers' indemnity claim.
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 8.3 of the SPA, properly construed, extinguishes the underlying liability for breach of warranty if not notified within two years, thereby precluding the Buyer from relying on alleged breaches of warranty as an equitable set-off against the Sellers' indemnity claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Summary judgment granted in favour of the Sellers for the indemnity claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment