N (A Child: Religion: Jehovah's Witness), Re [2011] EWHC B26 (Fam) (24 August 2011)

N (A Child: Religion: Jehovah's Witness), Re [2011] EWHC B26 (Fam) (24 August 2011)

The court held that N's welfare required a shared residence order with an equal or near-equal division of time between both parents, as this would best guard against the risk of either parent's religious perspective predominating and promote N's balanced development. Both parents are permitted to introduce N to their respective faiths, but neither may formally instruct or give lessons in their beliefs. The mother is prohibited from withdrawing N from school or social activities for religious reasons without consultation. Both parents may take N abroad on holiday, subject to safeguards. Orders regarding medical consent are made to ensure both parents' involvement and to protect N's welfare...

Citation
[2011] EWHC B26 (Fam)
Parties
Mother: JLM; Father: GLM; Child: N
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Children Act 1989 Proceedings (private Law) / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
Outcome
Shared residence order granted with detailed arrangements for time division, religious upbringing, holidays, and medical consent.
Legal Topics
Shared Residence, Religious Upbringing, Parental Responsibility, Contact Arrangements, Medical Consent, Freedom of Religion, Welfare of the Child
Family Law Child Law Human Rights Shared Residence Religious Upbringing Parental Responsibility Contact Arrangements Medical Consent +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JLM

Mother

GLM

Father

N

Child

Procedural Posture

Children Act 1989 Proceedings (private Law) / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 How should N's time be divided between his separated parents?
  2. 2 To what extent should the mother be permitted to involve N in the practices of Jehovah's Witnesses?
  3. 3 Should either parent be permitted to take N abroad on holiday?

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that N's welfare required a shared residence order with an equal or near-equal division of time between both parents, as this would best guard against the risk of either parent's religious perspective predominating and promote N's balanced development. Both parents are permitted to introduce N to their respective faiths, but neither may formally instruct or give lessons in their beliefs. The mother is prohibited from withdrawing N from school or social activities for religious reasons without consultation. Both parents may take N abroad on holiday, subject to safeguards. Orders regarding medical consent are made to ensure both parents' involvement and to protect N's welfare...

Court Disposition

Shared residence order granted with detailed arrangements for time division, religious upbringing, holidays, and medical consent.

Orders

  • N's time to be divided between parents on a four-week cycle as per the father's proposal, with minor modification in week four.
  • Both parents may take N abroad on holiday, subject to advance disclosure of details.