Fletcher v Davis & Anor

Fletcher v Davis & Anor

There was no binding shareholders' agreement between Mr Fletcher and Mr Davis; Mr Fletcher is not entitled to remuneration or damages for exclusion. However, Mr Fletcher is entitled to reimbursement for payments made to discharge PFI's liabilities, as these constituted a director's loan to the company.

Parties
Claimant: Noel Edward Fletcher; First Defendant: Trevor Davis; Second Defendant: Public Forums Internet (PFI) Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim for reimbursement allowed; all other claims dismissed.
Legal Topics
Shareholders' Agreements, Directors' Remuneration, Authority of Directors, Restitution for Payments, Corporate Structure, Breach of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Noel Edward Fletcher

Claimant

Trevor Davis

First Defendant

Public Forums Internet (PFI) Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Existence and breach of shareholders' agreement
  2. 2 Entitlement to directors' remuneration and consultancy fees
  3. 3 Authority to make payments on behalf of company

Ratio Decidendi

There was no binding shareholders' agreement between Mr Fletcher and Mr Davis; Mr Fletcher is not entitled to remuneration or damages for exclusion. However, Mr Fletcher is entitled to reimbursement for payments made to discharge PFI's liabilities, as these constituted a director's loan to the company.

Court Disposition

Claim for reimbursement allowed; all other claims dismissed.

Orders

  • PFI to reimburse Mr Fletcher £106,389.28 for payments made to discharge company liabilities.
  • No order on patent entitlement claim.