Sarayiah v Suren & Anor [2004] EWHC 1981 (QB) (10 September 2004)
Default judgment against the third defendant is set aside because he has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim on grounds of limitation, lack of liability for republication, qualified privilege, and justification; procedural defects in joinder and service entitle new defendants to challenge joinder; joinder of new defendants after expiry of limitation is only permissible if 'necessary' under CPR 19.5 and Limitation Act 1980 s35, which is not satisfied here; payment into court by third defendant is refused.
- Citation
- [2004] EWHC 1981 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Isaac Sarayiah; First Defendant: Lucienne Claire Suren; Second Defendant: Clemency Willson – Fraser; Third Defendant: Andrew Foster; Fourth Defendant: Deborah Ann Shewell; Fifth Defendant: RDF Media Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Slander/defamation / Interlocutory Applications—setting Aside Default Judgment, Joinder, Limitation, and Related Procedural Matters
- Outcome
- Default judgment against third defendant set aside; joinder of third, fourth, and fifth defendants set aside; claimant's application for payment into court refused.
- Legal Topics
- Slander, Joinder of Parties, Limitation Periods, Default Judgment, Qualified Privilege, Re Publication Liability, Injunctions, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isaac Sarayiah
Claimant
Lucienne Claire Suren
First Defendant
Clemency Willson – Fraser
Second Defendant
Andrew Foster
Third Defendant
Deborah Ann Shewell
Fourth Defendant
RDF Media Limited
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Slander/defamation / Interlocutory Applications—setting Aside Default Judgment, Joinder, Limitation, and Related Procedural Matters
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether default judgment against the third defendant should be set aside under CPR 13.3
- 2 Whether the joinder of the third, fourth, and fifth defendants was proper under CPR 19.5 and Limitation Act 1980 s35
- 3 Whether claims against new defendants are time-barred and if s32A Limitation Act 1980 applies
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgment against the third defendant is set aside because he has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim on grounds of limitation, lack of liability for republication, qualified privilege, and justification; procedural defects in joinder and service entitle new defendants to challenge joinder; joinder of new defendants after expiry of limitation is only permissible if 'necessary' under CPR 19.5 and Limitation Act 1980 s35, which is not satisfied here; payment into court by third defendant is refused.
Court Disposition
Default judgment against third defendant set aside; joinder of third, fourth, and fifth defendants set aside; claimant's application for payment into court refused.
Orders
- Default judgment against Andrew Foster (third defendant) set aside.
- Joinder of Andrew Foster, Deborah Ann Shewell, and RDF Media Limited as defendants set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment