Alexander & Co v Glazier [2001] EWCA Civ 897 (8 May, 2001)
The applicant failed to show any further valid defence or counterclaim beyond the reductions already made by the trial judge. The deficiencies in the solicitors' conduct and billing were addressed by the reduction of the sum claimed, and no further reduction or claim was justified. There was no realistic prospect of success on appeal.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 897
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Alexander & Co; Defendant/applicant: Peter James Glazier
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Client Costs, Appeals, Professional Negligence, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander & Co
Claimant/respondent
Peter James Glazier
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent solicitors were entitled to recover the sum claimed for costs from the applicant
- 2 Whether the applicant had valid defences or counterclaims based on alleged negligence, failure to account, or other defaults by the solicitors
- 3 Whether the deficiencies in the solicitors' bills or conduct justified a further reduction in the amount owed
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to show any further valid defence or counterclaim beyond the reductions already made by the trial judge. The deficiencies in the solicitors' conduct and billing were addressed by the reduction of the sum claimed, and no further reduction or claim was justified. There was no realistic prospect of success on appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment