Rippon Patel And French LLP v Mowlam [2020] EWHC 1079 (QB) (06 May 2020)
The bill had not been fully paid as the VAT element remained in the client account; special circumstances existed due to ambiguity over VAT and the level of costs at settlement; delay did not cause material prejudice; and the Master's exercise of discretion was not flawed.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 1079 (QB)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Rippon Patel and French LLP; Respondent/claimant: Ronald Mowlam
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Senior Court Costs Office
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Client Costs Assessment, Special Circumstances Under Solicitors Act 1974, Delay in Application for Assessment, VAT on Legal Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rippon Patel and French LLP
Appellant/defendant
Ronald Mowlam
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Senior Court Costs Office
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the solicitor's bill had been paid for the purposes of section 70(4) Solicitors Act 1974
- 2 Whether special circumstances existed to justify a detailed assessment under section 70(3) Solicitors Act 1974
- 3 Whether delay by the respondent precluded assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The bill had not been fully paid as the VAT element remained in the client account; special circumstances existed due to ambiguity over VAT and the level of costs at settlement; delay did not cause material prejudice; and the Master's exercise of discretion was not flawed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Detailed assessment of the solicitor's bill to proceed
- Costs to follow the event, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment