Ashfakul Bari v Arnold Rosen (t/a Ra Rosen And Co Solicitors)
The retainer letter did not entitle the solicitor to issue interim statute bills; the series of bills rendered were requests for payment on account and could be treated as a single final statute bill for assessment; special circumstances existed justifying assessment outside the statutory time limit.
- Parties
- Claimant (respondent): Ashfakul Bari; Defendant (appellant): Arnold Rosen (T/A RA Rosen and Co Solicitors)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Master Leonard
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Client Costs Assessment, Retainer Interpretation, Statute Bills, Special Circumstances for Assessment, Chamberlain Bills
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ashfakul Bari
Claimant (respondent)
Arnold Rosen (T/A RA Rosen and Co Solicitors)
Defendant (appellant)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Master Leonard
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the solicitor was contractually entitled to issue interim statute bills
- 2 Whether the series of bills could be treated as a single final statute bill for assessment
- 3 Whether special circumstances justified assessment outside the statutory time limit
Ratio Decidendi
The retainer letter did not entitle the solicitor to issue interim statute bills; the series of bills rendered were requests for payment on account and could be treated as a single final statute bill for assessment; special circumstances existed justifying assessment outside the statutory time limit.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Defendant to pay costs of the appeal
- Costs to be assessed at detailed assessment hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment