Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP
A third party assessment under section 71 of the Solicitors Act 1974 is limited to excluding items for which the third party is not liable and items only recoverable by special arrangement; it does not permit reduction of items properly agreed between solicitor and client, nor does it allow an order for repayment by the solicitor to the third party where the client has paid the bill. The third party's remedy for overpayment lies against the client, not the solicitor.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Tim Martin Interiors Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Akin Gump LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) and Senior Courts Costs Office
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Solicitors' Costs Assessment, Third Party Costs Liability, Mortgagee and Mortgagor Costs, Section 71 Solicitors Act 1974, Assessment Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tim Martin Interiors Ltd
Claimant/appellant
Akin Gump LLP
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) and Senior Courts Costs Office
Legal Issues
- 1 Scope of third party assessment under section 71 Solicitors Act 1974
- 2 Whether a third party can challenge the reasonableness of costs agreed between solicitor and client
- 3 Whether a solicitor can be ordered to repay a third party sums paid to the client but not properly due under the mortgage
Ratio Decidendi
A third party assessment under section 71 of the Solicitors Act 1974 is limited to excluding items for which the third party is not liable and items only recoverable by special arrangement; it does not permit reduction of items properly agreed between solicitor and client, nor does it allow an order for repayment by the solicitor to the third party where the client has paid the bill. The third party's remedy for overpayment lies against the client, not the solicitor.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order of Lewison J affirmed, setting aside the final costs certificate and the Master's order for payment by the solicitor to the third party.
- Matter remitted to another costs judge for assessment on the correct basis, though the court doubted the utility of a new assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment