Aisbitt v Conrathe & Anor
The solicitors had actual authority from the applicant to withdraw the judicial review application, and coming off the record did not revoke that authority. There was no evidence of loss as the judicial review had negligible prospects of success, and no causative link was established between the solicitors' conduct and the applicant's medical condition. The judge's findings were justified and not arguable for reversal.
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Kirsty Fiona Aisbitt; Defendant/respondent: Mr Paul Conrathe; Defendant/respondent: Coningsbys Solicitors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor's Authority, Damages, Costs, Judicial Review Withdrawal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kirsty Fiona Aisbitt
Applicant/claimant
Mr Paul Conrathe
Defendant/respondent
Coningsbys Solicitors
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether solicitors had authority to withdraw judicial review application
- 2 Whether the applicant was properly informed of the consent order
- 3 Whether the judge erred in holding a judicial review within a professional negligence trial
Ratio Decidendi
The solicitors had actual authority from the applicant to withdraw the judicial review application, and coming off the record did not revoke that authority. There was no evidence of loss as the judicial review had negligible prospects of success, and no causative link was established between the solicitors' conduct and the applicant's medical condition. The judge's findings were justified and not arguable for reversal.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment