LISA JONES v RICHARD SLADE AND COMPANY LTD
The court does not have jurisdiction under section 70 of the Solicitors Act 1974 to set aside a concluded agreement between solicitor and client on grounds of undue influence or economic duress within costs assessment proceedings; such relief must be sought in separate proceedings.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Lisa Jones; Defendant/appellant: Richard Slade and Company Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Senior Courts Costs Office Decision on Strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Solicitors' Costs Assessment, Jurisdiction Under Solicitors Act 1974 Section 70, Setting Aside Agreements, Economic Duress, Contentious Business Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lisa Jones
Claimant/respondent
Richard Slade and Company Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Senior Courts Costs Office Decision on Strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the court have jurisdiction under section 70 of the Solicitors Act 1974 to set aside an agreement between solicitor and client on grounds of undue influence or economic duress within costs assessment proceedings?
- 2 Is a freestanding equitable remedy (setting aside the agreement) available within section 70 proceedings?
Ratio Decidendi
The court does not have jurisdiction under section 70 of the Solicitors Act 1974 to set aside a concluded agreement between solicitor and client on grounds of undue influence or economic duress within costs assessment proceedings; such relief must be sought in separate proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The court below had no jurisdiction to set aside the agreement under section 70; the relevant part of the claim is struck out or stayed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment