Hibbert Pownall & Newton (A Firm) v Whitehead & Anor
The estate cannot recover damages from HPN for the loss of the opportunity to recover future care costs after Paula McLeish's death, as such damages would constitute an unjustified windfall and are not losses for which HPN owed a duty to protect. HPN owed no duty of care to Eric Whitehead in his personal capacity, as there was no retainer, assumption of responsibility, or circumstances making it fair, just and reasonable to impose such a duty.
- Parties
- Appellant / Respondent to Cross Appeal: Hibbert Pownall & Newton (a firm); First Claimant & First Respondent / Appellant in Cross Appeal: Eric Whitehead (on his own and as Administrator of the Estate of Paula McLeish, deceased); Second Claimant & Second Respondent: David McLeish
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor's Duty of Care, Loss Assessment, Wrongful Birth, Limitation of Damages, Duty to Third Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hibbert Pownall & Newton (a firm)
Appellant / Respondent to Cross Appeal
Eric Whitehead (on his own and as Administrator of the Estate of Paula McLeish, deceased)
First Claimant & First Respondent / Appellant in Cross Appeal
David McLeish
Second Claimant & Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the solicitors (HPN) are liable in damages to the estate for failing to bring the first action to a conclusion before the death of Paula McLeish, thereby curtailing recoverable damages
- 2 Whether HPN owed a duty of care to Eric Whitehead in his personal capacity to advise him of a potential claim against the health authority
Ratio Decidendi
The estate cannot recover damages from HPN for the loss of the opportunity to recover future care costs after Paula McLeish's death, as such damages would constitute an unjustified windfall and are not losses for which HPN owed a duty to protect. HPN owed no duty of care to Eric Whitehead in his personal capacity, as there was no retainer, assumption of responsibility, or circumstances making it fair, just and reasonable to impose such a duty.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- HPN's appeal against the award of damages on the primary claim is allowed; the award to the estate is set aside.
- Eric Whitehead's cross-appeal on his personal claim is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment