Marsh v Sofaer & Anor [2003] EWHC 3334 (Ch) (4 December 2003)

Marsh v Sofaer & Anor [2003] EWHC 3334 (Ch) (4 December 2003)

There is no legal duty on a solicitor to communicate concerns about a client's mental capacity to another solicitor acting for the same client in separate criminal proceedings without the client's consent. Such communication would breach the duty of confidence owed to the client. No implied waiver or relaxation of confidentiality arises in these circumstances.

Citation
[2003] EWHC 3334 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Marsh; Defendants: Sofaer & Another
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil (professional Negligence) / Application to Strike Out or for Summary Judgment
Outcome
Claim struck out in part (offending paragraphs)
Legal Topics
Solicitor's Duty of Confidence, Implied Waiver of Confidentiality, Duty to Inform Other Solicitors, Mental Capacity of Client, Collateral Attack on Conviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marsh

Claimant

Sofaer & Another

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Civil (professional Negligence) / Application to Strike Out or for Summary Judgment

  1. 1 Whether a solicitor owes a duty to inform another solicitor acting for the same client in criminal proceedings about concerns regarding the client's mental capacity
  2. 2 Whether such a duty would breach the duty of confidence owed to the client
  3. 3 Whether the claim constitutes a collateral attack on a criminal conviction

Ratio Decidendi

There is no legal duty on a solicitor to communicate concerns about a client's mental capacity to another solicitor acting for the same client in separate criminal proceedings without the client's consent. Such communication would breach the duty of confidence owed to the client. No implied waiver or relaxation of confidentiality arises in these circumstances.

Court Disposition

Claim struck out in part (offending paragraphs)

Orders

  • Offending paragraphs relating to the alleged duty to inform criminal solicitors of claimant's mental capacity are struck out.