Marsh v Sofaer & Anor

Marsh v Sofaer & Anor

There is no legal duty on a solicitor, retained in relation to civil matters, to communicate concerns about a client's mental capacity to another solicitor acting for the same client in criminal proceedings, as this would breach the duty of confidence owed to the client. No relaxation of the duty of confidence was present or could be implied in this case.

Parties
Claimant: Marsh; Defendants: Sofaer & Another
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Strike Out or for Summary Judgment
Outcome
Application granted; relevant paragraphs struck out.
Legal Topics
Solicitor's Duty of Confidence, Implied Waiver of Confidentiality, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications, Collateral Attack on Conviction
Professional Negligence Confidentiality Civil Procedure Solicitor's Duty of Confidence Implied Waiver of Confidentiality Summary Judgment Strike Out Applications Collateral Attack on Conviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marsh

Claimant

Sofaer & Another

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application to Strike Out or for Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a solicitor owes a duty to inform another solicitor acting for the same client in criminal proceedings of concerns about the client's mental capacity
  2. 2 Whether such a duty would breach the duty of confidence owed to the client
  3. 3 Whether the claim amounts to a collateral attack on a criminal conviction

Ratio Decidendi

There is no legal duty on a solicitor, retained in relation to civil matters, to communicate concerns about a client's mental capacity to another solicitor acting for the same client in criminal proceedings, as this would breach the duty of confidence owed to the client. No relaxation of the duty of confidence was present or could be implied in this case.

Court Disposition

Application granted; relevant paragraphs struck out.

Orders

  • Offending paragraphs of the particulars of claim relating to the alleged duty to inform criminal solicitors struck out.