Abdullah Nasser Bin Obaid & Ors v RLS Solicitors Limited (trading as RLS Law)
On proper construction, the Settlement Deed did not bar the Claimants from bringing a professional negligence claim against their own solicitors (RLS), as the release was intended to bar claims only against agents of other parties, not one’s own agents. The Deputy Master’s order striking out the claim was therefore wrong in law.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Abdullah Nasser Bin Obaid; Claimant/appellant: OH-NA Real Estate Company Limited; Claimant/appellant: TAQA Investment Company; Defendant/respondent: RLS Solicitors Limited (trading as RLS Law)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Judgment on Appeal From Deputy Master’s Order Striking Out Claim
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order striking out claim set aside; Defendant’s application to strike out or summarily dismiss the claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Solicitors’ Negligence, Interpretation of Settlement Agreements, Fiduciary Duties, Summary Judgment, Striking Out Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdullah Nasser Bin Obaid
Claimant/appellant
OH-NA Real Estate Company Limited
Claimant/appellant
TAQA Investment Company
Claimant/appellant
RLS Solicitors Limited (trading as RLS Law)
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Judgment on Appeal From Deputy Master’s Order Striking Out Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Settlement Deed barred the Claimants from bringing a professional negligence claim against their own solicitors (RLS)
- 2 Proper construction of the Settlement Deed regarding releases and scope of barred claims
Ratio Decidendi
On proper construction, the Settlement Deed did not bar the Claimants from bringing a professional negligence claim against their own solicitors (RLS), as the release was intended to bar claims only against agents of other parties, not one’s own agents. The Deputy Master’s order striking out the claim was therefore wrong in law.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order striking out claim set aside; Defendant’s application to strike out or summarily dismiss the claim dismissed.
Orders
- Order of Deputy Master striking out the claim and giving judgment for Defendant set aside.
- Defendant’s application dated 7 October to strike out or summarily dismiss the claim dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment