Polley v Warner Goodman & Streat (a firm)

Polley v Warner Goodman & Streat (a firm)

The appellant's cause of action accrued when the time for service of the summons expired on 24 September 1993, as there was no good reason for not serving in time and any extension would have been set aside; thus, the claim was time-barred when commenced in 2000.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: Michael Charles Polley; Respondents/defendants: Warner Goodman & Streat (A Firm)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Portsmouth County Court on Preliminary Issue of Limitation
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Solicitors' Negligence, Limitation Period Accrual, Loss and Damage in Tort, Extension of Time for Service

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Charles Polley

Appellant/claimant

Warner Goodman & Streat (A Firm)

Respondents/defendants

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Portsmouth County Court on Preliminary Issue of Limitation

  1. 1 When does a cause of action for solicitors' negligence accrue for limitation purposes?
  2. 2 Did the appellant suffer actionable damage before 14 April 1994?
  3. 3 Was there good reason for not serving the summons within the prescribed period?

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's cause of action accrued when the time for service of the summons expired on 24 September 1993, as there was no good reason for not serving in time and any extension would have been set aside; thus, the claim was time-barred when commenced in 2000.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Time extended for respondents' notice
  • Appeal dismissed with costs, not to be enforced without the permission of the court