Blankley v Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals NHS Trust
Supervening mental incapacity of a party does not, in itself, frustrate or terminate a solicitor’s retainer; the contract remains in force and authority to act can be restored by appointment of a deputy or recovery of capacity. The CFA was not terminated by the claimant’s incapacity, so costs incurred after incapacity remain recoverable under the original agreement.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Diann Blankley (by her Litigation Friend Andrew M. G. Cusworth); Defendant/respondent: Central Manchester and Manchester Children’s University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Appeal (personal Injury Litigation) / High Court Appeal From District Judge's Costs Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; application to strike out parts 4 to 7 of the Bill of Costs dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor's Retainer, Frustration of Contract, Mental Incapacity, Conditional Fee Agreements, Costs Recovery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Diann Blankley (by her Litigation Friend Andrew M. G. Cusworth)
Claimant/appellant
Central Manchester and Manchester Children’s University Hospitals NHS Trust
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Costs Appeal (personal Injury Litigation) / High Court Appeal From District Judge's Costs Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Does supervening mental incapacity of a party automatically terminate a solicitor’s retainer?
- 2 If so, can the retainer be adopted or renewed by a deputy?
- 3 Are solicitors entitled to reasonable fees for necessary services under the Mental Capacity Act 2005?
Ratio Decidendi
Supervening mental incapacity of a party does not, in itself, frustrate or terminate a solicitor’s retainer; the contract remains in force and authority to act can be restored by appointment of a deputy or recovery of capacity. The CFA was not terminated by the claimant’s incapacity, so costs incurred after incapacity remain recoverable under the original agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; application to strike out parts 4 to 7 of the Bill of Costs dismissed.
Orders
- Defendant’s application to strike out parts 4 to 7 of the claimant’s Bill of Costs is dismissed.
- No order on the appeal against the Second Judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment