Global Marine Drillships Ltd v Landmark Solicitors LLP & Ors [2011] EWHC 2685 (Ch) (24 October 2011)
Summary judgment cannot be granted against Landmark Solicitors LLP and Salina Jayne Jones due to unresolved factual disputes regarding Global Marine's alleged authorisation of the payments and the circumstances of the breach. The Quistclose trust applies, but the defences require full trial. Summary judgment against Mr Mullins is not granted as he did not participate in proceedings and factual issues remain.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 2685 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Global Marine Drillships Limited; Defendant/respondent: Landmark Solicitors LLP; Defendant/respondent: Salina Jayne Jones; Defendant/respondent: Frank Mullins (also known as Frank Crawford)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / Post Hearing Judgment
- Outcome
- Summary judgment refused; case to proceed to trial.
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor's Undertaking, Quistclose Trust, Breach of Trust, Summary Judgment Principles
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Global Marine Drillships Limited
Claimant/applicant
Landmark Solicitors LLP
Defendant/respondent
Salina Jayne Jones
Defendant/respondent
Frank Mullins (also known as Frank Crawford)
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Post Hearing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Landmark Solicitors LLP and Salina Jayne Jones breached the solicitor's undertaking by misapplying £7 million held for Global Marine
- 2 Whether Global Marine authorised the payments made by Landmark to Charles Barber
- 3 Whether summary judgment should be granted against Landmark, Ms Jones, and Mr Mullins
Ratio Decidendi
Summary judgment cannot be granted against Landmark Solicitors LLP and Salina Jayne Jones due to unresolved factual disputes regarding Global Marine's alleged authorisation of the payments and the circumstances of the breach. The Quistclose trust applies, but the defences require full trial. Summary judgment against Mr Mullins is not granted as he did not participate in proceedings and factual issues remain.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment refused; case to proceed to trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment