LT and DT v City & County of Cardiff & Anor [2007] EWHC 2568 (Admin) (09 November 2007)
The Second Respondent did not actively oppose the appeal nor engage in flagrant improper behaviour; therefore, no order for costs can be made against it, and the appeal is dismissed with no order for costs.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 2568 (Admin)
- Parties
- Appellants: LT and DT; First Respondent: City and County of Cardiff; Second Respondent: Gwyn Eirug Davies (Chair of Special Educational Needs Tribunal for Wales)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Appeal / Judgment on Costs Following Substantive Relief by Tribunal Review
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with no order for costs
- Legal Topics
- Special Educational Needs, Tribunal Procedure, Costs Orders, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LT and DT
Appellants
City and County of Cardiff
First Respondent
Gwyn Eirug Davies (Chair of Special Educational Needs Tribunal for Wales)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Appeal / Judgment on Costs Following Substantive Relief by Tribunal Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Second Respondent should be ordered to pay the Appellants' costs after quashing its own decision and granting a rehearing
- 2 Whether the conduct of the Second Respondent amounted to flagrant improper behaviour justifying a costs order
Ratio Decidendi
The Second Respondent did not actively oppose the appeal nor engage in flagrant improper behaviour; therefore, no order for costs can be made against it, and the appeal is dismissed with no order for costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with no order for costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment