DM & Anor v Essex County Council
The Essex programme imposes a responsibility on parents to participate in the delivery of special educational provision. In the absence of parental consent, this amounts to a failure by the LEA to fulfil its statutory duty, and the tribunal erred in law in upholding the programme.
- Parties
- Claimants: DM and KC; First Defendant: Essex County Council; Second Defendant: Special Educational Needs Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Special Educational Needs, Statutory Duties of Local Authorities, Parental Involvement in Education
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DM and KC
Claimants
Essex County Council
First Defendant
Special Educational Needs Tribunal
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Essex programme unlawfully imposes an obligation on parents to deliver special educational provision
- 2 Whether the LEA fulfilled its statutory duty under section 324 of the Education Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The Essex programme imposes a responsibility on parents to participate in the delivery of special educational provision. In the absence of parental consent, this amounts to a failure by the LEA to fulfil its statutory duty, and the tribunal erred in law in upholding the programme.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Tribunal's decision quashed
- Matter remitted to the tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment