TP Global Operations Ltd (t/a 1Global) v Insightful Technology Ltd [2024] EWHC 3106 (Comm) (15 November 2024)
The defendant is contractually obliged to return the client data to the claimant following termination, subject only to the capped fee of £150,000, and is not entitled to withhold transfer pending end user consents, additional fees, or a licence. Damages are not an adequate remedy due to the regulatory context and the nature of the data. The claimant is entitled to a mandatory interlocutory injunction for data transfer upon undertaking to pay the capped fee.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 3106 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: TP Global Operations Limited (trading as 1Global); Defendant/respondent: Insightful Technology Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Application for Interlocutory Mandatory Injunction / Interlocutory Application Judgment
- Outcome
- Interlocutory mandatory injunction granted in favour of the claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Mandatory Injunction, Data Return Obligations, GDPR Compliance, Adequacy of Damages, Contractual Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TP Global Operations Limited (trading as 1Global)
Claimant/applicant
Insightful Technology Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application for Interlocutory Mandatory Injunction / Interlocutory Application Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is contractually obliged to return client data to the claimant under clause 25.3 and Schedule 6 of the services agreement
- 2 Whether the obligation to return data is subject to conditions precedent, including provision of storage space and end user consents
- 3 Whether the defendant is entitled to withhold data transfer pending payment of additional fees or a licence
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant is contractually obliged to return the client data to the claimant following termination, subject only to the capped fee of £150,000, and is not entitled to withhold transfer pending end user consents, additional fees, or a licence. Damages are not an adequate remedy due to the regulatory context and the nature of the data. The claimant is entitled to a mandatory interlocutory injunction for data transfer upon undertaking to pay the capped fee.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory mandatory injunction granted in favour of the claimant.
Orders
- Defendant to transfer all relevant client data to the claimant in accordance with the contract and Schedule 6.
- Claimant to provide an undertaking to pay £150,000 to the defendant upon receipt of the data.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment