Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd & Ors [2015] EWHC 1029 (Pat) (24 April 2015)
The issues of whether Unwired Planet's April and July 2014 proposals are FRAND, and whether Unwired Planet is obliged to offer single patent, standard-specific, or territory-specific licences, cannot be determined summarily as they are fact-dependent and intertwined with competition law considerations. There is a real prospect of Unwired Planet defending its FRAND claims, and the applications for summary judgment and strike out are refused. Unwired Planet is permitted to amend its claim to seek a declaration that its proposals are FRAND, subject to conditions requiring both parties to set out the licence terms they would offer or accept for the five patents in suit.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 1029 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant: Unwired Planet International Limited; First Defendant: Huawei Technologies Co. Limited; Second Defendant: Huawei Technologies (UK) Co. Limited; Third Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co. Limited; Fourth Defendant: Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited; Fifth Defendant: Google Inc.; Sixth Defendant: Google Ireland Limited; Seventh Defendant: Google Commerce Limited; Ninth Party: Unwired Planet Inc.; Tenth Party: Unwired Planet LLC; Eleventh Party: Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Competition Law Proceedings / Interlocutory Judgment on Summary Judgment, Strike Out, and Amendment Applications
- Outcome
- Applications for summary judgment and strike out refused; application to amend claim to seek declaration allowed with conditions; application for open-ended declaration refused.
- Legal Topics
- Standard Essential Patents (seps), FRAND Licensing, Patent Infringement, Competition Law Defences, Injunctions, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unwired Planet International Limited
Claimant
Huawei Technologies Co. Limited
First Defendant
Huawei Technologies (UK) Co. Limited
Second Defendant
Samsung Electronics Co. Limited
Third Defendant
Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited
Fourth Defendant
Google Inc.
Fifth Defendant
Google Ireland Limited
Sixth Defendant
Google Commerce Limited
Seventh Defendant
Unwired Planet Inc.
Ninth Party
Unwired Planet LLC
Tenth Party
Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson
Eleventh Party
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Competition Law Proceedings / Interlocutory Judgment on Summary Judgment, Strike Out, and Amendment Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Unwired Planet's April and July 2014 licensing proposals are FRAND under the ETSI IPR Policy and Declaration
- 2 Whether the court should grant summary judgment or strike out Unwired Planet's claim that its proposals are FRAND
- 3 Whether Unwired Planet is obliged to offer single patent, standard-specific, or territory-specific licences under the ETSI IPR Policy
Ratio Decidendi
The issues of whether Unwired Planet's April and July 2014 proposals are FRAND, and whether Unwired Planet is obliged to offer single patent, standard-specific, or territory-specific licences, cannot be determined summarily as they are fact-dependent and intertwined with competition law considerations. There is a real prospect of Unwired Planet defending its FRAND claims, and the applications for summary judgment and strike out are refused. Unwired Planet is permitted to amend its claim to seek a declaration that its proposals are FRAND, subject to conditions requiring both parties to set out the licence terms they would offer or accept for the five patents in suit.
Court Disposition
Applications for summary judgment and strike out refused; application to amend claim to seek declaration allowed with conditions; application for open-ended declaration refused.
Orders
- Refusal of Huawei's application for summary judgment and strike out of Unwired Planet's FRAND claims.
- Permission granted to Unwired Planet to amend its claim to seek a declaration that its April and July 2014 proposals are FRAND, subject to the claimant stating whether it will offer a territorial licence for the five patents in suit and setting out proposed terms; defendants to set out terms they would accept.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment