Misa Zgonec-Rozej & Ors v Dr Stephen Pereira & Ors
Although Dr Pereira breached his duty of care by failing to communicate his absence, failing to provide a sufficient handover to Dr Bakshi, and failing to arrange individual psychotherapy expeditiously, these breaches did not cause or contribute to Mr Jones’ death. The claimants failed to prove causation on the balance of probabilities. The claim was therefore dismissed.
- Parties
- First Claimant (on Her Own Behalf and as Executor of the Estate of Mr John Richard William Day Jones Deceased): Ms Misa Zgonec-Rozej; Second Claimant (a Child Represented by His Mother and Litigation Friend Ms Misa Zgonec Rozej): Patrick Zgonec Jones; Third Claimant (a Child Represented by His Mother and Litigation Friend Ms Misa Zgonec Rozej): Zachary Zgonec Jones; First Defendant: Dr Stephen Pereira; Second Defendant (settled Before Trial): Dr Neelam Bakshi; Third Defendant (settled Before Trial): Florence Nightingale Hospitals Limited (trading as The Nightingale Hospital)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (medical Negligence/fatal Accidents) / High Court Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Standard of Care, Causation, Contributory Negligence, Quantum of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Misa Zgonec-Rozej
First Claimant (on Her Own Behalf and as Executor of the Estate of Mr John Richard William Day Jones Deceased)
Patrick Zgonec Jones
Second Claimant (a Child Represented by His Mother and Litigation Friend Ms Misa Zgonec Rozej)
Zachary Zgonec Jones
Third Claimant (a Child Represented by His Mother and Litigation Friend Ms Misa Zgonec Rozej)
Dr Stephen Pereira
First Defendant
Dr Neelam Bakshi
Second Defendant (settled Before Trial)
Florence Nightingale Hospitals Limited (trading as The Nightingale Hospital)
Third Defendant (settled Before Trial)
Procedural Posture
Civil (medical Negligence/fatal Accidents) / High Court Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dr Pereira was negligent in his care of Mr Jones
- 2 Whether any negligence caused or materially contributed to Mr Jones' death
- 3 Whether Mr Jones was contributorily negligent
Ratio Decidendi
Although Dr Pereira breached his duty of care by failing to communicate his absence, failing to provide a sufficient handover to Dr Bakshi, and failing to arrange individual psychotherapy expeditiously, these breaches did not cause or contribute to Mr Jones’ death. The claimants failed to prove causation on the balance of probabilities. The claim was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim against Dr Pereira dismissed
- No damages awarded
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment