Brown v Birmingham and Black Country Strategic Health Authority & Ors

Brown v Birmingham and Black Country Strategic Health Authority & Ors

The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that either Dr Shukru or the hospital breached the standard of care required in the circumstances, or that any alleged breach caused the claimant's injuries. The evidence did not establish that the dermal sinus was pointed out to Dr Shukru, nor that the hospital's failure to perform further investigations was outside the range of reasonable medical practice. Even if there had been a breach, causation was not established.

Parties
Claimant: Rachael Diana Brown (a patient by her litigation friend Angela Brown); 1st Defendant: Birmingham and Black Country Strategic Health Authority; 2nd Defendant: Mrs Patricia May Shukru (Widow and personal representative of Dr Umit Shukru, deceased); 3rd Defendant: Medical Defence Union Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Medical Negligence / Judgment on Liability
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Standard of Care, Causation, Delay in Litigation, Limitation, Expert Evidence
Tort Medical Negligence Standard of Care Causation Delay in Litigation Limitation Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rachael Diana Brown (a patient by her litigation friend Angela Brown)

Claimant

Birmingham and Black Country Strategic Health Authority

1st Defendant

Mrs Patricia May Shukru (Widow and personal representative of Dr Umit Shukru, deceased)

2nd Defendant

Medical Defence Union Limited

3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Medical Negligence / Judgment on Liability

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the general practitioner (Dr Shukru) was negligent in failing to diagnose or refer the claimant's congenital spinal defect and associated infection
  2. 2 Whether the hospital (New Cross Hospital/First Defendant) was negligent in failing to perform appropriate investigations (CT scan/lumbar puncture) during the claimant's admissions
  3. 3 Whether any alleged breaches caused or contributed to the claimant's injuries

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that either Dr Shukru or the hospital breached the standard of care required in the circumstances, or that any alleged breach caused the claimant's injuries. The evidence did not establish that the dermal sinus was pointed out to Dr Shukru, nor that the hospital's failure to perform further investigations was outside the range of reasonable medical practice. Even if there had been a breach, causation was not established.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed