Burnden Group Holdings Ltd v Hunt [2018] EWHC 463 (Ch) (14 March 2018)
A fully paid shareholder is a 'contributory' for the purposes of IR r.4.79 and thus has standing to apply for inspection of proofs of debt. However, the applicant must also demonstrate a legitimate interest in the relief sought, such as a real prospect of a surplus in the liquidation. In this case, Group failed to establish a legitimate interest or prima facie evidence of a surplus, so inspection should not have been ordered.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 463 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Burnden Group Holdings Limited; Respondent/appellant: Stephen Hunt (Liquidator of Burnden Holdings (UK) Limited)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Judge's Order Regarding Inspection of Proofs of Debt in Liquidation
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; District Judge's order set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Standing of Contributories, Inspection of Proofs of Debt, Definition of Contributory, Liquidation Procedures, Costs Orders in Insolvency Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Burnden Group Holdings Limited
Applicant/respondent
Stephen Hunt (Liquidator of Burnden Holdings (UK) Limited)
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Judge's Order Regarding Inspection of Proofs of Debt in Liquidation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a fully paid shareholder is a 'contributory' entitled to inspect proofs of debt under IR r.4.79
- 2 Whether the District Judge erred in ordering inspection of proofs of debt and making a personal costs order against the liquidator
Ratio Decidendi
A fully paid shareholder is a 'contributory' for the purposes of IR r.4.79 and thus has standing to apply for inspection of proofs of debt. However, the applicant must also demonstrate a legitimate interest in the relief sought, such as a real prospect of a surplus in the liquidation. In this case, Group failed to establish a legitimate interest or prima facie evidence of a surplus, so inspection should not have been ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; District Judge's order set aside.
Orders
- Order permitting inspection of proofs of debt by Group set aside.
- Personal costs order against Mr Hunt set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment