Jennison & Anor v Jennison [2022] EWHC 792 (Ch) (04 April 2022)
A foreign executor whose grant of probate is resealed in England and Wales under the Colonial Probates Act 1892 has standing to bring proceedings as executor, even if the resealing occurs after issue but before trial, as the authority derives from the will. The proceedings are not a nullity and any procedural defect can be cured under CPR 3.10. The lower court's exercise of discretion under CPR 3.10 was proper.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 792 (Ch)
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Richard Henry Jennison; Defendant/appellant: Mrs Gwyneth Mary Jennison; Claimant/respondent: Mrs Glenda Joy Jennison (as personal representative of the estate of Graham Jennison deceased)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision (business and Property Work)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Standing of Foreign Executors, Resealing of Foreign Probate, Procedural Nullity and CPR 3.10, Colonial Probates Act 1892, Executor's Authority to Sue
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Henry Jennison
Defendant/appellant
Mrs Gwyneth Mary Jennison
Defendant/appellant
Mrs Glenda Joy Jennison (as personal representative of the estate of Graham Jennison deceased)
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision (business and Property Work)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a foreign executor with probate not yet resealed in England and Wales has standing to issue proceedings before resealing
- 2 Whether such proceedings are a procedural nullity or can be cured under CPR 3.10
- 3 Whether the court below properly exercised discretion under CPR 3.10
Ratio Decidendi
A foreign executor whose grant of probate is resealed in England and Wales under the Colonial Probates Act 1892 has standing to bring proceedings as executor, even if the resealing occurs after issue but before trial, as the authority derives from the will. The proceedings are not a nullity and any procedural defect can be cured under CPR 3.10. The lower court's exercise of discretion under CPR 3.10 was proper.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Claimant awarded costs of the appeal, subject to detailed assessment.
- Defendants to pay £16,000 on account of costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment