Dr Saeed Shehabi & Anor v The Kingdom Of Bahrain
Remote hacking of computers located in the UK by agents of a foreign state constitutes an act in the UK for the purposes of section 5 of the State Immunity Act 1978, and the state is not immune from civil proceedings for personal injury (including psychiatric injury) caused thereby, even if other causative acts occurred abroad.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Dr Saeed Shehabi; Respondent/claimant: Moosa Mohammed; Appellant/defendant: The Kingdom of Bahrain
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal; Determination of State Immunity Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- State Immunity, Personal Injury, Harassment, Jurisdiction, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Saeed Shehabi
Respondent/claimant
Moosa Mohammed
Respondent/claimant
The Kingdom of Bahrain
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal; Determination of State Immunity Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether remote hacking of computers in the UK by a foreign state is an act in the UK for purposes of state immunity exception under section 5 of the State Immunity Act 1978
- 2 Whether all causative acts must occur in the UK for the exception to apply
- 3 Whether psychiatric injury constitutes 'personal injury' under section 5
Ratio Decidendi
Remote hacking of computers located in the UK by agents of a foreign state constitutes an act in the UK for the purposes of section 5 of the State Immunity Act 1978, and the state is not immune from civil proceedings for personal injury (including psychiatric injury) caused thereby, even if other causative acts occurred abroad.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by the Kingdom of Bahrain is dismissed.
- The claimants may proceed with their claims in the High Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment