Sky Blue Sports & Leisure Ltd & Anor, R (on the application of) v Arena Coventry Ltd & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 453 (13 May 2016)
The Council's loan to ACL did not constitute unlawful state aid under Article 107 TFEU because, given the wide margin of judgment afforded to public authorities and the Council's position as freeholder and shareholder, a rational private investor could have made the loan under similar circumstances. The loan was at a commercial rate, fully secured, and based on prudent business planning. The Appellants failed to demonstrate that the transaction fell outside the bounds of reasonable decision-making or that no plausible explanation existed other than state aid.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 453
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Sky Blue Sports & Leisure Limited; Appellant/claimant: Arvo Master Fund Limited; Respondent/defendant: Coventry City Council; Interested Party: Arena Coventry Limited; Interested Party: Trustees of the Alan Edward Higgs Charity
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- State Aid Under Article 107 TFEU, Market Economy Operator Test, Recovery of Unlawful State Aid, Local Authority Powers, Commercial Investment by Public Bodies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sky Blue Sports & Leisure Limited
Appellant/claimant
Arvo Master Fund Limited
Appellant/claimant
Coventry City Council
Respondent/defendant
Arena Coventry Limited
Interested Party
Trustees of the Alan Edward Higgs Charity
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Coventry City Council's £14.4 million loan to Arena Coventry Limited constituted unlawful state aid under Article 107 TFEU
- 2 Whether the Council acted as a market economy operator
- 3 Whether the loan distorted or threatened to distort competition and affected trade between Member States
Ratio Decidendi
The Council's loan to ACL did not constitute unlawful state aid under Article 107 TFEU because, given the wide margin of judgment afforded to public authorities and the Council's position as freeholder and shareholder, a rational private investor could have made the loan under similar circumstances. The loan was at a commercial rate, fully secured, and based on prudent business planning. The Appellants failed to demonstrate that the transaction fell outside the bounds of reasonable decision-making or that no plausible explanation existed other than state aid.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No quashing of the Council's loan decision
- No order for recovery of alleged unlawful state aid
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment