Crown Estate Commissioners v The Peabody Trust & Anor
On the proper construction of s38(5)(d) of the Housing Act 1988, the definition of 'public body' includes the Crown Estate Commissioners. Therefore, upon transfer of the reversionary interest from the Claimant to the First Defendant, the tenants ceased to be regulated tenants and became assured tenants under the Housing Act 1988. There is no sufficient basis to depart from the literal meaning, and the Human Rights Act 1998 does not require a different result.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Crown Estate Commissioners; First Defendant: The Governors of the Peabody Trust; Second Defendant (representative Defendant Pursuant to CPR 19.7): Margaret Poplak
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial of Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Declaratory relief granted in favour of the First Defendant's construction; tenants became assured tenants on transfer.
- Legal Topics
- Status of Tenants After Transfer of Reversion, Interpretation of Housing Act 1988 S38(5)(d), Effect of Transfer From Crown Estate Commissioners to Housing Association, Application of Human Rights Act 1998 to Housing Status, Conflict Between Housing Act 1988 Ss35 and 38
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown Estate Commissioners
Claimant
The Governors of the Peabody Trust
First Defendant
Margaret Poplak
Second Defendant (representative Defendant Pursuant to CPR 19.7)
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial of Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the status of former regulated tenants of the Crown Estate Commissioners after transfer to a housing association?
- 2 Does s38(5)(d) of the Housing Act 1988 include land managed by the Crown Estate Commissioners as 'public body'?
- 3 Should s38(5)(d) be given a purposive construction to exclude the Crown Estate Commissioners?
Ratio Decidendi
On the proper construction of s38(5)(d) of the Housing Act 1988, the definition of 'public body' includes the Crown Estate Commissioners. Therefore, upon transfer of the reversionary interest from the Claimant to the First Defendant, the tenants ceased to be regulated tenants and became assured tenants under the Housing Act 1988. There is no sufficient basis to depart from the literal meaning, and the Human Rights Act 1998 does not require a different result.
Court Disposition
Declaratory relief granted in favour of the First Defendant's construction; tenants became assured tenants on transfer.
Orders
- Declaration that tenants of the First Defendant to whom this action is applicable have become assured tenants upon the Claimant’s transfer of interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment